April 29, 2012

What DRTV Buyers Like/Don't Like

Below are some more findings from my first DRTV Experiences survey. Before I get into that, however, I want to thank everyone who responded to my last post with thoughtful comments and suggestions. Thanks to one reader in particular (HT: Mark S.), I now know that the margin of error for my survey was 8.73% at a standard 95% confidence level, something to keep in mind as I reveal the results.

Many people wrote me to say that they weren't convinced an opinion survey could yield accurate data about price preferences. Some examples:

  • "Not sure you can accurately test the $10, $9.95 and $9.99 with a preference survey? Purchase behavior could be vastly different than a 'thinking' answer to a survey."
  •  
  • "I don't think you can ask someone if they prefer a price point, as much of it happens on a subconscious level. There's a reason we like prices that evoke an 'impulse' buy. In my opinion, a better test would be convincing a marketer to run an A/B split on the two prices."
  •  
  • "Survey questions and answers are different from unbiased actual purchasing behavior … The survey bias of the respondents might over shadow their actual impulsive behavior or conservatism. 'I am not going to swayed by a mere nickel.' Or, 'Of course I would want the lowest price possible.' The question of each price point would have to be asked independently over a large sample with an attractive product, as in reality the customer does not get a chance to make a comparative decision."

These readers are right, of course. While asking DRTV buyers for their opinions is much better than believing in 'rules of thumb' or so-called logical arguments, it is not nearly as good as running actual sales tests to measure what people do instead of what they say they do. Perhaps that will be my next step in this learning process. There are many small variables that never get tested because of the cost and their limited impact on a CPO.

For example, no one would ever air an A/B split to determine if $10 is better than $9.99. However, thanks to modern Web-testing platforms like Permission Interactive's Predict-A-Hit, such 'micro-testing' is now cheaper and easier then ever, so it's quite possible I'll be able to validate my findings with sales testing in the near future.

Returning to the DRTV Experiences survey: One of the first things we asked people is what DRTV product(s) they had purchased and what they liked most and least about the experience. Here are the findings:

LIKED MOST

  • The ease and convenience of buying off TV were, by far, what people liked most about their DRTV buying experience. About 18% of respondents mentioned "ease" specifically, and another 10% mentioned "convenience."
  •  
  • The price of the product came in second with about 13% of respondents mentioning this factor.
  •  
  • And third? Believe it or not, 10% of respondents liked that the product worked as advertised.
  •  
  • Other things people mentioned: being excited by the product's promise (6%), the speed with which the product was delivered (6%) and the uniqueness of the product (4%).

Incidentally, here is a smattering of the most common products respondents purchased: Telebrands' Aluma Wallet, Allstar's Eggies, Allstar's EZ Moves, TriStar's Genie Bra, Telebrands' Lint Lizard, Telebrands' Orgreenic and Allstar's Perfect Meatloaf.

LIKED LEAST

  • The high cost of shipping and handling, especially with regard to BOGO offers that charge double S&H, was the biggest pet peeve of survey respondents. Thirteen percent of respondents mentioned this issue specifically.
  •  
  • There was a three-way tie for the second thing people liked least about their DRTV buying experience between: a) upsells, b) shipping delays and c) poor product quality. All three were mentioned by about 7% of respondents.
  •  
  • Another 6% of respondents said that the product they received did not work as advertised. This is interesting in light of the fact that 10% said the opposite.

So there you have it. Any DRTV marketer with experience and the ability to be honest already knows people don't like the tactics we use to get our average sale up. This survey just confirms it. However, these problems may not be solvable. As long as media costs continue to rise, and DRTV buyers remain much more willing to buy products at $10 than $20, these issues will remain.

On the bright side, these numbers imply that no one issue is overwhelming. For example, even if we apply the margin of error in an unfavorable way to the least liked aspect of DRTV buying (high S&H costs), we're still talking about less than one-quarter of DRTV buyers. Indeed, a much larger percentage of DRTV buyers (24% vs.13%) said they could think of nothing they disliked about their experience.

April 23, 2012

Free Market Research!

Separating facts from beliefs has always been an obsession of mine. For example, during my first year in the DRTV industry I saw a presentation that stated, "Fact: Only 10 percent of people will buy off TV." (The presentation was meant to convince retailers that DRTV advertising creates pent-up demand for hit products that cannot be satisfied by direct sales alone.) While I had no doubt the general premise was true, I had serious doubts about the specific information (it came with no source) and set about trying to calculate the actual number. Sure enough, it turned out the actual percentage was around nine percent and, as it turned out, shrinking.

Even more common than baseless factoids are logical arguments that become common wisdom without ever being tested. The most amusing of these is the $9.95 vs. $9.99 vs. $10 debate. Each of these price points has at least one passionate defender. I've heard that $9.95 is best because it sounds like $9.00 to buyers while generating $10.00 for sellers. I've heard that $9.99 is better than $9.95 because buyers see no difference between the two and sellers get an extra four cents per sale (which is a lot of money over a few million units). I've also heard that $10 is best because it is easier for people to understand taking a $10 bill out of their pocket than nine dollars and 95/99 cents. Yet, to my knowledge, no one has ever taken the time to investigate what buyers actually think about these price points ... until now.

Over the next week or so, I will be sharing the results of a recent survey we conducted of DRTV buyers to answer this question and a handful of others. I will post the information here on the blog, free of charge, for the edification of all. Even better, I intend to conduct a survey like this one every six months or so, and I will be soliciting questions from you, my readers.

But first, here is some information from our first survey:

1. We sent the survey to more than 600 people and received 126 responses. In other words, the sample size was large enough to draw conclusions.

2. Of those 126 respondents, 63 percent were women and 37 percent were men. This contradicts another factoid I used to hear all the time, that "80 percent of purchases are made by women." Of course, the gender mix has a lot to do with the products the industry is putting out, but in general it seems men are well represented in DR.

3. The vast majority of respondents were 50 years of age or older (85 percent): 38 percent were in their 50s, 38 percent were in their 60s and 9 percent were 70 or above. This finding actually supports a bit of common wisdom, that Baby Boomers are the center of the bull's-eye for DRTV, which makes sense given current American demographics.

4. All respondents had purchased at least one DRTV product in the last few years: 24 percent in the last month, 36 percent in the last six months and 21 percent in the last year.

In my next post, I will reveal what our 126 respondents said they liked most and what they liked least about their DRTV buying experience.

April 20, 2012

Congratulations to Impact!

Tonight, my friend Bill Quarless will celebrate the 10th anniversary of his company, Impact Products Ltd. (see this press release). Congratulations to Bill and the Impact team!

SciMark Report from April Response

My SciMark Report for April is now available on the Response Website. This month, I took a break from reviews to introduce the "Fabulous Five", an update and revision to my Divine Seven list of product criteria.

April 13, 2012

Dueling Slippers

Review: Stompeez

Description: Plush slippers
Main Pitch: "Walk, stomp or jump and [they] pop to life"
Main Offer: $19.95 for one pair
Bonus: N/A
Marketer: IdeaVillage
Producer: Infomercials Inc.
Website: www.Stompeez.com

Review: Silly Slippeez

Main Pitch: "The glow in the dark slippers that pop to life"
Main Offer: $19.95 for one pair
Bonus: N/A
Marketer: Tristar
Website: www.SillySlippeez.com

More evidence than detente is dead. I first posted about Stompeez in September of 2011, so the campaign has a huge headstart -- not to mention much better creative (from the producer that brought you Pillow Pets) and a formidable retail distributor behind it. The 'glow in the dark' angle is not enough to overcome all of that, so I give this one to Stompeez in a landslide.